|
1. |
What type of error is ontological? |
| |
A) |
Similarity. |
| |
B) |
Ambiguity. |
| |
C) |
Reality. |
| |
D) |
Language. |
|
2. |
Which is NOT a type of sloppy language? |
| |
A) |
Weasel words. |
| |
B) |
Meaningless jargon. |
| |
C) |
Diversions. |
| |
D) |
Technobabble. |
|
3. |
How is a weasel word special? |
| |
A) |
Its meaning is clear and concise. |
| |
B) |
A weasel word cannot be challenged. |
| |
C) |
It has more than one meaning. |
|
4. |
Science fiction goes one step beyond which term? |
| |
A) |
Technobabble. |
| |
B) |
Analogies. |
| |
C) |
Reification. |
|
5. |
Reification is a: |
| |
A) |
fallacy. |
| |
B) |
category Error. |
| |
C) |
analogy. |
| |
D) |
false Similarity. |
|
6. |
Which type of analogy is based on a weak or irrelevant similarity? |
| |
A) |
Dangling analogy. |
| |
B) |
Regular analogy. |
| |
C) |
False Analogy. |
| |
D) |
True Analogy. |
|
7. |
What is a category error that involves taking an abstraction, belief, or hypothetical construct, and treating it as if it were a concrete entity, something real? |
| |
A) |
Reification. |
| |
B) |
Reductionism. |
| |
C) |
Redaction. |
| |
D) |
False Reality. |
|
8. |
A Fallacy of ________ involves using an unclear word or phrase. |
| |
A) |
Ambiguity |
| |
B) |
Uncertainty |
| |
C) |
Inconclusiveness |
| |
D) |
Incertitude |
|
9. |
A false similarity claims that if two things are alike in one way: |
| |
A) |
they are also alike in a way in which they are not. |
| |
B) |
they are always more alike in similar categories. |
| |
C) |
it has no barring on how alike they are in another category. |
| |
D) |
All of the above. |
|
10. |
The Fallacy of Division is the opposite of the Fallacy of: |
| |
A) |
Dangling Analogies. |
| |
B) |
Composition. |
| |
C) |
Core Knowledge Confusion. |
| |
D) |
Reification. |
|
11. |
Applying an attribute of one type of reality to another is: |
| |
A) |
Ontology. |
| |
B) |
Reification. |
| |
C) |
Ontological Fusion. |
| |
D) |
Category error. |
|
12. |
What is a weasel word? |
| |
A) |
A word with one/multiple meanings. |
| |
B) |
A word that vague. |
| |
C) |
A word with many applicable interpretations. |
| |
D) |
All of the above. |
|
13. |
"Students are like horses. They learn best when subjected to strong discipline" is an example of a: |
| |
A) |
false analogy. |
| |
B) |
false similarity. |
| |
C) |
dangling analogy. |
| |
D) |
fallacy of composition. |
|
14. |
What is technobabble? |
| |
A) |
Language that appears to be specialized and meaningful but in fact communicates nothing. |
| |
B) |
Incorporates scientific-sounding jargon in an extended argument. |
| |
C) |
What I hear when I call the RMU Help Desk. |
| |
D) |
When a person repeats the same technology word so often it stops sounding like a real word. |
|
15. |
Words such as "some," "people in the know," "many," or "most" fall into the category of what type of sloppy language? |
| |
A) |
Weasel Words. |
| |
B) |
Meaningless Jargon. |
| |
C) |
Technobabble. |
| |
D) |
All of the above. |
|
16. |
What is a fallacy of ambiguity? |
| |
A) |
Fairytale that includes characters and location. |
| |
B) |
Folktales that have been around for centuries. |
| |
C) |
Keyword or phrase with unclear/multiple meanings. |
| |
D) |
Keyword or phrase that includes a clear meaning in the claim. |
|
17. |
What are the three examples of sloppy language given in the book? |
| |
A) |
Weasel words, meaningless jargon, technobabble. |
| |
B) |
Weasel words, indicator words, technobabble. |
| |
C) |
Meaningless jargon, analogies, category errors. |
| |
D) |
Technobabble, category errors, meaningless jargon. |
|
18. |
A category error that involves taking an abstraction, belief, or hypothetical construct, and treating it as if it were a concrete entity, something real: |
| |
A) |
Core knowledge confusion. |
| |
B) |
Reductionism. |
| |
C) |
Reification. |
| |
D) |
Emergent properties. |
|
19. |
Erroneously claims that what is true for component parts must by definition be true for the whole: |
| |
A) |
False Analogies. |
| |
B) |
Fallacy of Composition. |
| |
C) |
Ontological Fusion. |
| |
D) |
Fallacy of Division. |
|
20. |
Reductionism is defined as: |
| |
A) |
applying an attribute of one type of reality to another. |
| |
B) |
various levels of analysis have their own theories and explanations. |
| |
C) |
based on a weak or irrelevant similarity. |
| |
D) |
an error of mistakenly applying explanations appropriate for one level of analysis to another. |
|
21. |
Which of these is not an example of sloppy language? |
| |
A) |
Weasel words |
| |
B) |
Meaningless jargon |
| |
C) |
Baboon words |
| |
D) |
Technobabble |
| |
E) |
None of the above (all are examples of sloppy language). |
|
22. |
When we turn something that is not a thing into a thing it is called: |
| |
A) |
Reification. |
| |
B) |
Category error. |
| |
C) |
Ontological fusion. |
| |
D) |
False analogy. |
|
23. |
An analogy that is not explained or grounded in a solid logical argument is: |
| |
A) |
fallacy of composition. |
| |
B) |
usually not an error. |
| |
C) |
a dangling analogy. |
| |
D) |
a false analogy. |
|
24. |
Examples of weasel words include: |
| |
A) |
Some, many, most... |
| |
B) |
It is claimed that... It is well known that... |
| |
C) |
Often, likely, commonly... |
| |
D) |
All the above. |